|
|
|
|
Abt 1276 - Yes, date unknown
-
Born |
Abt 1276 |
Sowerby, Yorkshire, England [1, 2] |
Gender |
Male |
_UID |
8144307094D64A0D98C8C565F0EE9692B6EE |
Died |
Yes, date unknown |
Person ID |
I1891 |
OuthouseLine2014 |
Last Modified |
21 May 2014 |
Children |
> | 1. Adam DEL FELD, b. Abt 1300, Sowerby, Yorkshire, England , d. Abt 1350, Sowerby, Yorkshire, England |
|
Last Modified |
1 Jan 2007 |
Family ID |
F771 |
Group Sheet |
-
Sources |
- [S49] Field Genealogy, Frederick Clifton Pierce, (Chicago, Hammond Press, W. B. Conkey Company: 1901), pg 66 (Reliability: 3).
Field Family of England
I. ROGER DEL FIELD, b. Sowerby, Engand, about 1240 --- ---. He was descended from Sir Hubertus De la Feld and the head of the family which settled in Lancaster and Kent counties, England. Res. Sowerby, England.
2. i. Richard, b. about 1276; m. --- ---
3. ii Thomas b., about 1278, m. --- ---
- [S49] Field Genealogy, Frederick Clifton Pierce, (Chicago, Hammond Press, W. B. Conkey Company: 1901), pg 66 (Reliability: 3).
RICHARD DE FELD (Roger), b. about 1276, in Sowerby, England; m. --- ---. The existing roles of Wakefield Manor commence in 1284, but are very imperfect until 1306. A roll endorsed 1272 and called first roll, is a mistake for first of Edward II, and, therefore, 1307. The first entry in them relating to the Field family is in 1306, and refers to a suit of Richard del Feld, of Sowerby, against Robert, son of William Saltonstall. In 1308 Richard de Feld served as a juror, being described in the entry as son of Roger del Feld. Throughout the part of the Wakefield rolls referred to in this book the name is written "ffeld." These two small letters then stood for the capital one, which we now use. Osgood Field says, "very probably Richard and Thomas were brothers." Res. Sowerby, England.
|
|
|
|